Testing AppImage on Linux distributions/Testando AppImage nas distribuições Linux

[marcelocripe]

Hello dear colleagues,

I couldn’t find a specific topic here at https://discourse.appimage.org bringing together all Linux distributions where the programs in AppImage format have already been tested.

I propose to start this topic, where each one will be able to inform the Linux distribution, containing the name, version and information if it worked or not, as well as names of the programs in “.AppImage” format that worked.

Distribution: antiX Linux 16.3 x64 full
Programs tested and that worked: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage, Opera-x86_64.AppImage and LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage

Distribution: antiX Linux 17.4.1 x64-full.iso
Programs tested and that worked: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage and LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage

Distribution: antiX Linux 19.2 x64 full
Programs tested and that worked: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage, Opera-x86_64.AppImage and LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage

Distribution: Slax 9.11.0 64 bits
Programs tested and that worked: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage and LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage

Distribution: SliTaz
Tested program that didn’t work: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage **

More details about the test at the link:
https://discourse.appimage.org/t/how-to-use-appimage-in-slitaz-gnu-linux-5-0-como-usar-o-appimage-no-slitaz-gnu-linux-5- 0/1744/3

Distribution: Tiny Core Linux (Tiny Core Plus 11.1 32 bit):
Tested program that didn’t work: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage **

marcelocripe

Original text in Brazilian Portuguese, translated into English by the Google translator.

---

Olá caros colegas,

Eu não consegui encontrar aqui no https://discourse.appimage.org um tópico específico reunindo todas as distribuições Linux onde os programas em formato AppImage já tenham sido testados.

Eu proponho iniciarmos este tópico, onde cada um poderá informar a distribuição Linux, contendo o nome, a versão e a informação se funcionou ou não, bem como nomes dos programas em formato “.AppImage” que funcionaram.

Distribuição: antiX Linux 16.3 x64 full
Programas testados e que funcionaram: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage, Opera-x86_64.AppImage e LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage

Distribuição: antiX Linux 17.4.1 x64-full.iso
Programas testados e que funcionaram: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage e LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage

Distribuição: antiX Linux 19.2 x64 full
Programas testados e que funcionaram: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage, Opera-x86_64.AppImage e LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage

Distribuição: Slax 9.11.0 64 bits
Programas testados e que funcionaram: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage e LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage

Distribuição: SliTaz
Programa testado e que não funcionou: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage**

Mais detalhes sobre o teste no link:

How to use AppImage in SliTaz GNU / Linux 5.0 / Como usar o AppImage no SliTaz GNU/Linux 5.0

probono, Thank you for responding. I apologize for the delay, I am having to do several tests, including installing programs (packages) in the SliTaz distro and antiX without access to the internet, video and audio and other basic programs that are necessary for any user. Before applying the commands, in graphical mode, I made the following changes to the permissions on the file ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage, right-click, Properties, Permissions tab, changes in Access contr…

Distribuição: Tiny Core Linux (Tiny Core Plus 11.1 32 bits):
Programa testado e que não funcionou: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage**

marcelocripe

Texto original no idioma português do Brasil, traduzido para inglês pelo tradutor do Google.

[probono]

Hello, please test on a mainstream distribution, e.g., Ubuntu LTS. Does it work there?

[marcelocripe]

Hello Probono, how are you?

Ubuntu LTS, like other Linux distributions, unfortunately requires a lot of processing and a lot of RAM, we need Linux operating systems that consume little processing and little RAM.

“Fighting the obsolescence of computer and notebook hardware program.”

Continuing the tests

Distribution: Void Linux 5.3.9_1 x86_64 (void-live-x86_64-20191109.iso)
Tested program that didn’t work: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage

$ chmod a + x ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage

$ ./ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage
[5267: 5267: 0801 / 215832.895781: ERROR: zygote_host_impl_linux.cc (89)] Running as root without --no-sandbox is not supported. See https://crbug.com/638180.

It would be interesting for more colleagues to contribute information from other Linux distributions.

marcelocripe

Original text in Brazilian Portuguese, translated into English by the Google translator.

---

Olá Probono, tudo bem com você?

O Ubuntu LTS, assim como outras distribuições Linux, infelizmente exigem muito processamento e muita memória RAM, precisamos de sistemas operacionais Linux que consomem pouco processamento e pouca memória RAM.

“Lutando contra a obsolescência programa de hardwares de computadores e notebooks.”

Continuando os testes

Distribuição: Void Linux 5.3.9_1 x86_64 (void-live-x86_64-20191109.iso)
Programa testado e que não funcionou: ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage

$ chmod a+x ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage

$ ./ungoogled-chromium_71.0.3578.98-2_linux.AppImage
[5267:5267:0801/215832.895781:ERROR:zygote_host_impl_linux.cc(89)] Running as root without --no-sandbox is not supported. See https://crbug.com/638180.

Seria interessante que mais colegas contribuíssem com informações de outras distribuições Linux.

marcelocripe

Texto original no idioma português do Brasil, traduzido para inglês pelo tradutor do Google.